All Mention of Humans’ Role in Climate Change Conspicuously Deleted in National Parks Report

All Mention of Humans’ Role in Climate Change Conspicuously Deleted in National Parks Report

Science is being censored yet again by the federal government. Every mention of human beings’ role in climate change has been deleted from a National Park Service report. Also deleted was the word “anthropogenic,” relating to humans’ impact on nature. Now Democrats in Congress have called for the Department of Interior to investigate the deletions.

The still unreleased report, first drafted in 2016 by a climate scientist from the University of Boulder, discusses sea level rise and storm surge – both of which are directly tied to climate change. The report’s purpose is to relate to the officials and the public how national parks will be affected, and what they can do to help. But when The Center for Investigative Reporting reviewed the original and subsequent drafts, they discovered that any language tying human activity to climate change was removed.

Scientists Report Climate Change Really Did Make Hurricane Harvey Worse

Ninety-two percent of coastal national park land will be affected by the rising seas and increasing storms of our changing climate. The report is an essential tool for park employees, scientists, officials, and the public as these rapid changes occur. Holding the report back for two years and eradicating a critical component of the science — humans’ role in climate change and environmental damage — is a disturbing move by the government.

“Censorship of this kind is something you’d see in Russia or some totalitarian regime.”

Jonathan Overpeck, a climate scientist and dean of the University of Michigan’s School for Environment and Sustainability, said the revelation was “shocking” and commented, “To remove a very critical part of the scientific understanding is nothing short of political censorship and has no place in science. Censorship of this kind is something you’d see in Russia or some totalitarian regime.” The Interior Department has a scientific integrity policy, committing to leaving politics out of their policies and reports. Failing to do so could undermine the integrity of scientific reports produced by the government for years to come.

Head of the Interior Department Ryan Zinke testified to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee last month, attesting that scientific reports were not being edited. But with the Revel News publication, members of Congress are asking questions. Why has the report been held back? Just who is behind the deletions? Were the deletions due to a specific agenda or an example of the attitudes of our current administration?

Although 97% of scientists and almost two-thirds of Americans agree that humans’ use of fossil fuels is affecting our climate, the Trump Administration has gone to ridiculous lengths to deny that fact. The words “climate change” were removed from the government’s climate change resource website. There was uproar from the public and scientists when seven words were banned from being used in the CDC’s budget process.

The US Government’s Climate Change Site No Longer Contains the Words ‘Climate Change’

Note: Please keep comments peaceful and family friendly.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


  1. Nelson Petrie

    With an idiotic and a notorious anti-science president like Trump, it is not surprising that any mention of anthropocentric or human sources relating to climate change has been deleted. Trump has deleted America’s membership to the UN Climate Change accord – the only country to do so. I don’t know why he doesn’t take climate change seriously. Is it because he’s been influenced by Bible -backing evangelical leaders who wish to see the end of the world or is it because of his total lack of ignorance in science.? He only knows one thing- that is, how to make women the object of his sexual fantasies and desires. Nothing else is in his head. He can’t even spell correctly or write sensibly. Yet, Americans have been so foolish to elect this man as their leader thus making the entire America and her citizens the laughing stock of the world.1

    Reply Report comment

    When we look at what is happening to our environment the world over, we are looking at what human beings have created. There can be no separation between the two. Yesterday I watched ‘A Plastic Ocean’ and let me just say that the plastics in our oceans and in our dump sites are all about human beings. Plastics are choking the life our of the oceans and with climate change, the oceans are dying. The oceans regulate temperatures around the world and when they are gone, we will be the ones to pay the price and so it should be because this will be a direct result of our pollution and our ignorance in thinking that the world will go on and on regardless of what we do to it.

    Reply Report comment
  3. Endlesspath

    It is very simple to explain: Since the ACC (anthropomorphic climate change, aka “Man-caused global warming”) is a by a series of cherry-picked data points represented by constantly flawed and failing models, it was decided to remove the PC motivated opinion aspect.
    When you remove the near religious-cult perspective of ACC, you are only left with facts.

    Reply Report comment
  4. Leanne

    Trump is clearly anti environment. He trying to hoodwink us all.

    Reply Report comment

Get The Newsletter!

Fields marked with an * are required
Sign This Petition